 |
 |
 |
|
 |

Dramatic
Market Change Regarding Professional
Liability Insurance
By
Brian Ahern, RPLU, President
of Ahern Insurance Brokerage
If
you are like most law
firms, 2003 and 2003 will
be challenging years in
respect to securing Professional
Liability Insurance. The
"new market"
is similar to that of
the mid 80s and has caused
consolidation of carriers,
poor loss history, declining
investment income, reinsurance
and limited capacity.
Over
the past 12 months, nine
insurance companies have
left the California market.
The diminishing supply
of insurers has given
law firms fewer options
promulgating a less competitive
environment. In addition,
many of the insurance
companies remaining have
specific underwriting
requirements such as number
of claims, size of firm,
etc. For smaller firms
with claim activity, the
options available are
primarily hard to place
facilities, which typically
offer no prior acts coverage
and limits of no more
than $1 million. There
are still over 20 insurance
companies providing coverage
in California but the
aforementioned underwriting
guidelines limit most
firms to no more than
five insurance companies
to choose from.
Current
market status can be described
as, "a fluctuation
in the insurance/reinsurance
market characterized by
an increase in the pricing
level of insurance and
reinsurance coverage."
During
the soft market, which
last took place 1988 to
2001, many carriers were
forced to constantly lower
premiums and provide broader
coverage enhancements.
This aggressive underwriting,
which took shape in the
mid 90s, is now rearing
its ugly head as companies
are in a better position
to evaluate their losses
due to the closing or
maturing of claims that
were filed three to five
years ago. For many carriers,
loss ratios of 125 percent
to 250 percent and more
have been commonplace.
These numbers are compared
to a "benchmark"
or standard in the industry
equaling approximately
90 percent -- including
the company's operating
costs.
The
above losses often have
been exacerbated by carriers'
declining investment returns.
For several years, carriers
could take large gains
from their bond and stock
portfolio and use them
to offset losses due to
inadequate premium rates.
Due to this fact, many
companies have had to
revert back to the true
fundamentals of underwriting.
The
role of reinsurance also
has an impact on the rising
costs of professional
liability insurance, due
to the fact that insurance
companies insure part
of the risk they underwrite
by purchasing reinsurance.
Although 9/11 did not
have a direct impact on
lawyers malpractice insurance,
it did dramatically impact
the reinsurance market.
Most carriers renegotiated
their reinsurance treaties
in January or June of
2003 and have passed large
price increases along
to their insured. Additionally,
subsequent losses that
have impacted and will
continue to impact the
insurance industry such
as the demise of companies
like Enron will add significantly
to the negative influences
on reinsurance markets.
Law
firms seeking liability
insurance should also
keep in mind that most
carriers have capacity
limits in terms of how
much business they can
write. With prices increasing
and limited capacity available,
carriers are reaching
their maximum volume.
As this starts to take
place, carrier underwriters
become even more selective
and conservative in their
underwriting.
What
does the future hold?
Predicting future insurance
premiums is similar to
predicting stock or home
prices. It appears, however,
that the hard market will
be here until at least
the remainder of 2003
and into 2003. Interestingly,
pricing today is still
lower for most firms than
it was in 1985, which
gives concern that we
have not seen the end
of rate increases. Most
firms this year can expect
a minimum increase of
25 to 40 percent. Additionally,
firms with claim histories,
high-risk areas of practice,
i.e., plaintiff personal
injury, securities, wills
and estate planning, entertainment,
patent and intellectual
property, and/or below
market rates due to multi-year
policies or policies with
carriers who have left
the market, can expect
increases well over 100
percent.
What
can you do? Some recommendations
are to:
Start your renewal process
early. Make sure to give
your agent 30 to 45 days
to negotiate your risk.
Spend time on your application.
Ensure your application
and supplements are complete
with a full description
of any claims filed against
you and/or your firm.
Explain what your firm
did to ensure these types
of claims do not continue.
If you or your firm practices
in an area that is considered
high risk, i.e., patent
and copyright, but the
work you and/or your firm
does is litigation based,
make sure your application
states such.
Work with an agent who
knows your business and
specializes in professional
liability insurance. This
undoubtedly will save
you and/or your firm time
and frustration. Another
suggestion is to ask your
insurance broker how many
carriers he/she represents
as well as how many firms
he/she insurers.
Focus on the big picture.
A mistake that many firms
make is focusing just
on price - remember bad
pricing is what got us
into this mess. Look for
a competitive product,
but also take the time
to review the policy and
understand how the carrier
handles claims. For example,
does the carrier allow
input with respect to
defense counsel? If not,
who is on its panel counsel?
Evaluate limits and deductibles,
which means you need to
evaluate your practice.
Some questions to ask
yourself are: What are
your exposures in the
event of a claim? Are
your limits too low or
too high? Can you take
on a higher deductible
to reduce your premium?
A good rule of thumb for
a deductible in a hard
market is around $2,500
per lawyer.
Become educated. Law firms
should take the time to
understand how they can
better manage their firms
against the threat of
malpractice. For larger
firms, consider a risk
management audit to ensure
proper procedures are
in place. Make a point
of noting in your application
the steps and processes
the firm has taken to
make your firm a better
risk.
Take precautions in the
event of a merger or lateral
hire. Make sure to review
the respective claim history
of the firm or attorney
before a decision is made.
If the attorney and/or
firm have past claims,
understand how the association
will affect your firm.
Firms also need to find
out how their practice
areas will be perceived
by their carrier.
Do not sue for fees. Law
firm suits for fees generate
a large number of malpractice
claims. The reason for
this is that once the
suit is filed, the answer
most often will include
a defense and an affirmative
counterclaim stating that
the fee was not paid solely
due to the fact that the
attorney's performance
was deficient. The counterclaim
becomes for all practical
purposes a malpractice
claim against the law
firm.
Sometimes
the amount involved or
the particular circumstances
of representation may
require a suit against
a client for a fee. However,
any decision to undertake
any form of collection
activity against a client
is one, which should only
be taken after you understand
its hazards. A strong
recommendation is to gain
the advice of independent
counsel and launch a lengthy
and comprehensive review
of the entire situation
be made before collection
activity is initiated.
It
is estimated that approximately
10 percent of all malpractice
claims originate as counterclaims
to suits for fees, and
approximately 50 percent
of all suits for fees
generate malpractice counterclaims.
Pursuant to these statistics,
carriers are now looking
very closely at a firm's
approach to this issue
and in many cases are
declining to provide terms
for firms who sue for
fees.
The
outlook for the next 18
months appears to be bleak,
it is inevitable that
carriers that are on the
sidelines now will find
the increased rates very
attractive. When this
does happen, we will find
ourselves back in a soft
market, characterized
by increased competition
in which prices are depressed,
and is usually attributed
to excess capacity (more
sellers than buyers) and/or
high interest rates. The
soft market is estimated
to occur in 2004. Until
then, law firms can expect
prices to either steadily
increase and/or remain
higher than they have
been in the immediate
past.
Although
many firms have seen rates
increase from 25 to 40
percent, it is not uncommon
for rate increases to
be as high as 200 percent
as the underwriting community
considers California to
be one of the highest
risk states with respect
to malpractice. In fact,
one in six attorneys are
sued every year. Therefore
despite the increase in
rates, most firms are
electing to continually
purchase professional
liability insurance, eagerly
awaiting the return of
soft market conditions.

W. Brian
Ahern, RPLU, is President
of Ahern Insurance Brokerage
(AIB), an independently
owned insurance brokerage
firm specializing in professional
liability insurance for
the legal community. He
can be contacted by e-mail
at bahern@aherninsurance.com.
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|